江西省萍乡市人民政府


萍乡市劳动用工管理暂行办法



第 38 号


　《萍乡市劳动用工管理暂行办法》已经2007年5月18日市人民政府第11次常务会议讨论通过，现予公布施行。




市 长

二OO七年六月三日




第一章 总 则

　　第一条 为规范劳动用工行为，保护用人单位和劳动者合法权益，维护劳动力市场秩序，根据《中华人民共和国劳动法》、《江西省劳动力市场管理条例》、《江西省劳动保障监察条例》以及《劳动力市场管理规定》等有关法律、法规和规章，结合本市实际，制定本办法。
　　第二条 本市行政区域内的企业、个体经济组织、民办非企业单位、社会团体等用人单位（以下简称用人单位）的劳动用工适用本办法。
　　第三条 市、县（区）劳动和社会保障行政部门（以下简称为劳动部门），按各自权限负责本行政区域内的劳动用工管理。
　　第四条 建立市、县（区）、乡（镇）、街道统一的劳动保障信息网络体系和萍乡市劳动力资源信息库以及萍乡市《劳动手册》管理制度。

第二章 用工管理

　　第五条 用人单位招用人员，应当面向社会、公开招收、公平竞争、择优录用。
用人单位并可依法确定招用人员的时间、方式、条件和数量。
　　第六条 用人单位应当通过下列途径自主招用人员：
　　（一）委托职业介绍机构；
　　（二）参加劳动力交流洽谈活动；
　　（三）通过大众传播媒介刊播招用信息；
　　（四）利用互联网进行网上招聘；
　　（五）法律、法规规定的其他途径。
　　第七条 用人单位招用人员时，应当如实介绍本单位的性质、地点、公布招用人员数量、条件、工种、用工形式、工作期限、工资、福利待遇、社会保险以及录用办法等基本情况。
　　用人单位委托职业介绍机构招用人员时，应当出具包括前款内容的招用简章以及单位介绍信、营业执照副本等资料。
　　用人单位通过报刊、广播、电视、户外广告等大众传播媒介发布招用人员广告的，须经当地劳动部门审核，劳动部门应当在收到报批资料之日起3日内作出批准或者不批准的答复，未经批准的，大众传播媒介不得刊登、播发。
　　用人单位应当接受当地劳动部门组织的空岗调查，并主动报告空岗情况。
　　第八条 用人单位招用人员时，不得有下列行为：
　　(一)提供虚假招聘信息；
　　(二)招用无合法证件的人员；
　　(三)向求职者收取招聘费用；
　　(四)向被录用人员收取保证金或者抵押金等费用；
　　(五)扣押被录用人员的身份证等证件；
　　(六)以招用人员为名牟取不正当利益或者进行其他违法活动。
　　第九条 用人单位招用从事技术复杂以及涉及到国家财产、人民生命安全和消费者利益工种（职业）的劳动者，必须从已取得相应职业资格证书的人员中录用。
　　第十条 用人单位必须及时与被录用人员以书面形式签订劳动合同，按本办法规定办理备案手续。
　　第十一条 劳动合同可依法约定试用期，试用期最长不得超过6个月。劳动合同期限在6个月以下的，试用期不得超过15日；劳动合同期限在6个月以上1年以下的，试用期不得超过30日；劳动合同期限在1年以上2年以下的，试用期不得超过60日。
试用期限包括在劳动合同期限中。
　　第十二条 用人单位应当保证劳动者每日工作时间不超过8小时，平均每周工作时间不超过40小时。
用人单位由于生产经营需要，经与工会和劳动者协商后可以延长工作时间，一般每日不得超过1小时；因特殊原因需延长工作时间的，在保障劳动者身体健康的条件下延长工作时间每日不得超过3小时，但每月不得超过36小时。
　　第十三条 用人单位与劳动者签订劳动合同时约定的工资和用人单位支付给劳动者的工资，均不得低于本市确定的现行最低工资标准，法律、法规和规章另有规定的除外。
　　第十四条 劳动合同终止或者解除时，用人单位应当向劳动者出具《萍乡市终止解除劳动关系证明书》，依法应当给予劳动者经济补偿的应当予以补偿。
用人单位单方面解除与劳动者签订的劳动合同，应当事先将理由书面通知工会和劳动者本人。
劳动者解除劳动合同，应当按照《劳动法》规定提前30日以书面形式向用人单位提出。劳动者自动离职属于违法解除劳动合同，应当按照《违反〈劳动法〉有关劳动合同规定的赔偿办法》承担赔偿责任。
　　第十五条 用人单位濒临破产进行法定整顿期间或者生产经营状况发生严重困难，确需裁减人员的，应当提前30日向工会或者全体职工代表大会说明情况听取工会或者职工的意见，经向劳动部门报告后，方可裁减人员。
用人单位依据本条规定裁减人员，在6个月内录用人员的，应当优先录用被裁减的人员。
　　第十六条 用人单位应在每月底向当地劳动部门上报本单位调出、退休、自然减员人员名册，劳动部门应当从劳动力资源信息库中核销。

第三章 用工备案

　　第十七条 用人单位招用人员后，应当自录用之日起30日内到当地劳动部门办理录用备案手续，并为被录用人员办理就业登记。
　　第十八条 用人单位办理录用备案手续应提供下列材料：
　　（一）被录用人员的《劳动手册》，但录用初次就业人员的除外；
　　（二）与被录用人员签订的劳动合同；
　　（三）《萍乡市用人单位录用人员登记表》一式三份；
　　（四）被录用人员一寸免冠近照一张。
　　第十九条 劳动部门办理录用备案的主要内容：
　　（一）查验、核对用人单位提供的相关材料；
　　（二）在《萍乡市用人单位录用人员登记表》上加盖劳动部门录用备案专用章；留存一份《萍乡市用人单位录用人员登记表》，其余二份交用人单位；
　　（三）为初次就业人员办理《劳动手册》；
　　（四）在《劳动手册》上打印录用单位、录用时间等内容，加盖劳动部门录用备案专用章；
　　（五）按城镇、农村、外来人员分类分别把录用人员的相关资料输入萍乡市劳动力资源信息库。
　　第二十条 办理录用备案的劳动部门，应在每月底将办理的录用备案名册按归属关系，通报市、县（区）社会保险经办机构。
　　第二十一条 用人单位与劳动者终止或者解除劳动关系后，应当在7日内到当地劳动部门办理备案手续。
　　（一）填写一式五份《萍乡市终止解除劳动关系证明书》，当地劳动部门、养老保险经办机构、失业保险经办机构、用人单位各留存一份《萍乡市终止解除劳动关系证明书》；
　　（二）在被终止或者解除劳动关系劳动者的《劳动手册》上做好终止或者解除劳动关系日期的记载并加盖备案专用章；
　　（三）将《萍乡市终止解除劳动关系证明书》和《劳动手册》一起交被终止或者解除劳动关系的劳动者。

第四章 劳动手册

　　第二十二条 本市劳动者统一实行《劳动手册》制度，《劳动手册》用于记录劳动者就业、流动、失业、培训、工作简历、缴纳社会保险以及领取失业保险金等情况。
　　第二十三条 《劳动手册》由市劳动部门统一印制，统一编号，统一免费发放。
　　第二十四条 用人单位凭《萍乡市用人单位录用登记表》和与之签订的劳动合同到当地劳动部门为被录用人员申领《劳动手册》。
本办法实施以前的已就业人员，由用人单位持《萍乡市用人单位录用人员登记表》经当地劳动部门审核后，发放《劳动手册》。
　　第二十五条 劳动者就业期间，《劳动手册》由用人单位统一保管，用人单位应根据劳动者实际情况，及时、准确、完整地在《劳动手册》上填写相关内容。
　　第二十六条 《劳动手册》遗失应及时申请补领：
　　（一）已就业人员，凭用人单位书面申请，本人档案，并携带一寸免冠近照一张到原办理的劳动部门申请补领；
　　（二）失业人员，由本人书面申请，并携带一寸免冠近照一张到档案保管所在地劳动部门申请补领。

第五章 法律责任

　　第二十七条 用人单位违反本办法规定，发布虚假招聘信息，或者招用无合法证件人员的，由劳动部门根据《劳动力市场管理规定》第三十四条的规定责令其改正，并可处1000元以下罚款；对当事人造成损害的，依法承担赔偿责任。
　　第二十八条 用人单位违反本办法规定，以招用人员为名牟取不正当利益的，由劳动部门根据《江西省劳动力市场管理条例》第三十四条第（一）项的规定，没收其违法所得，并处以违法所得的2至4倍罚款。
　　第二十九条 用人单位违反本办法规定，收取报名费、登记费和资料费等费用，或者向被录用人员收取保证金、押金等费用，由劳动部门根据《江西省劳动力市场管理条例》第三十四条第（二）项的规定，责令退还给当事人，并按照其收取金额总数的2倍以上3倍以下处以罚款。
　　第三十条 用人单位违反本办法规定，扣押劳动者证件、实物的，由劳动部门依据《江西省劳动保障监察条例》第三十五条第（二）项的规定，责令改正，并处以500元以上1000元以下罚款；对当事人造成损失的，依法承担赔偿责任。
　　第三十一条 用人单位违反本办法第十条和第十四条的规定，不依法与劳动者签订劳动合同或者违反规定解除劳动合同的，由劳动部门根据《江西省劳动保障监察条例》第三十五条第（三）项的规定，责令限期改正，逾期不改正的，对法定代表人或者主要负责人处以500元以上2000元以下罚款，并按照每涉及1名劳动者对用人单位处以100元罚款进行处罚；对劳动者造成损失的依法承担赔偿责任。
　　第三十二条 用人单位违反本办法第十二条第二款的规定，未与工会和劳动者协商，强迫劳动者延长工作时间的，由劳动部门依据《江西省劳动保障监察条例》第三十五条第（四）项的规定，给予警告，责令改正，并可按每人每超过1小时处以30元以上100元以下的罚款进行处罚。
　　第三十三条 用人单位违反本办法第九条的规定，录用未取得国家职业资格证书的劳动者从事相应技术工种的，由劳动部门根据《江西省劳动保障监察条例》第三十五条第（七）项、第（八）项的规定，给予警告，责令限期对有关人员进行培训，取得国家职业资格证书后再上岗；用人单位逾期不改正的，按照每违规使用1名劳动者处以用人单位500元以上1000元以下罚款；对情节严重的，责令其停产停业整顿；造成严重后果构成犯罪的，依法追究刑事责任。
　　第三十四条 劳动部门工作人员在劳动用工管理中滥用职权、玩忽职守、徇私舞弊、构成犯罪的，依法追究刑事责任；不构成犯罪的，给予行政处分。

第六章 附 则

　　第三十五条 劳动部门办理录用备案实行免费服务。
　　第三十六条 本办法具体应用中的问题由萍乡市劳动和社会保障局负责解释。
　　第三十七条 本办法自公布之日起施行。





Hong Kong


CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES ORDINANCE
　(CHAPTER 71)
　CONTENTS
　　
　　ion
　　I　　　　PRELIMINARY
　　hort title
　　nterpretation and application
　　he "reasonableness" test
　　Dealing as consumer"
　　arieties of exemption clause
　　ower to amend Schedules 1 and 2
　　II　　　　CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES
　　dance of liability for negligence, breach of contract, etc.
　　egligence liability
　　iability arising in contract
　　nreasonable indemnity clauses Liability arising from sale or
supply of
　　s
　　"Guarantee" of consumer goods
　　Seller's liability
　　Miscellaneous contracts under which goods pass Other provisions
about
　　racts
　　Effect of breach on "reasonableness" test
　　Evasion by means of secondary contract
　　Arbitration agreements
　　III　　　CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE CONTROL DOES NOT APPLY
　　International supply contracts
　　Choice of law clauses
　　Saving for other relevant legislation
　　Application
　　IV　　　 CONSEQUENTIAL AND OTHER AMENDMENTS
　　(Omitted)
　　dule 1. Scope of sections 7, 8, 9 and 12
　　dule 2. "Guidelines" for application of reasonableness test
　　dule 3. (Omitted)
　Whole document
　　
　　imit the extent to which civil liability for breach　of　contract,　
or
　　negligence or other breach　of　duty,　can　be　avoided　by　
means　of
　　ract terms and　otherwise;　and　to　restrict　the　
enforceability　of
　　tration agreements.　[1 December 1990] L. N. 38 of 1990
　PART I PRELIMINARY
　　
　　hort title
　　Ordinance may be cited as the Control of Exemption Clauses
Ordinance.
　　nterpretation and application
　　In this Ordinance--
　　iness" includes a profession and the activities of a　public　
body,　a
　　ic　authority,　or　a　board,　commission,　committee　or　
other　body
　　inted by the Governor or Government;
　　ds" has the same meaning as in the Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap.
26);
　　ligence" means the breach--
　　of any obligation, arising from the express　or　implied　terms　
of　a
　　ract, to take reasonable care or　exercise　reasonable　skill　
in　the
　　ormance of the contract;
　　of any common law duty to take reasonable care or exercise　
reasonable
　　l (but not any stricter duty);
　　of the　common　duty　of　care　imposed　by　the　Occupiers　
Liability
　　nance (Cap. 314); "notice" includes an announcement, whether or
not in
　　hing, and any other communication or pretended communication;
　　sonal injury" includes any disease and any impairment of　
physical　or
　　al condition.
　　In the case of both contract and tort, sections 7 to 12 apply　
(except
　　e the　contrary　is　stated　in　section　11　(4))　only　to　
business
　　ility, that is liability for breach of obligations or duties
arising--
　　from things done or omitted to be done by a person in the course
of　a
　　ness (whether his own business or another's); or
　　from the occupation of premises used　for　business　purposes　
of　the
　　pier, and references to liability are　to　be　read　
accordingly;　but
　　ility of an occupier of premises for breach of an obligation　or　
duty
　　rds a person obtaining access to　the　premises　for　
recreational　or
　　ational purposes, being liability　for　loss　or　damage　
suffered　by
　　on of the dangerous state of the premises, is not a business
liability
　　he occupier unless granting that person such access for　the　
purposes
　　erned falls within the business purposes of the occupier.
　　In relation to any breach of duty　or　obligation,　it　is　
immaterial
　　her the breach was inadvertent or intentional,　or　whether　
liability
　　it arises directly or vicariously.
　　1977 c. 50 ss. 1&14 U. K.]
　　he "reasonableness" test
　　In relation to a contract term, the requirement of reasonableness　
for
　　purposes of this Ordinance and　section　4　of　the　
Misrepresentation
　　nance (Cap.　284)　is　satisfied　only　if　the　court　or　
arbitrator
　　rmines that the term was a fair and　reasonable　one　to　be　
included
　　ng regard to the circumstances which were, or ought reasonably
to have
　　, known to or in the contemplation of the parties　when　the　
contract
　　made.
　　In determining for the purposes of section 11 or 12 whether a
contract
　　satisfies the requirement of reasonableness, the court or　
arbitrator
　　l have regard in particular to the matters specified　in　
Schedule　2;
　　this subsection does not prevent the court or arbitrator from
holding,
　　ccordance with any rule of law, that a term which purports to　
exclude
　　estrict any relevant liability is not a term of the contract.
　　
　　In relation to　a　notice　(not　being　a　notice　having　
contractual
　　ct),　the　requirement　of　reasonableness　under　this　
Ordinance　is
　　sfied only if the court or arbitrator determines that it would
be fair
　　reasonable　to　allow　reliance　on　it,　having　regard　to　
all　the
　　umstances obtaining when the liability arose or (but for　the　
notice)
　　d have arisen.
　　In　determining　(under　this　Ordinance　or　the　
Misrepresentation
　　nance (Cap. 284)) whether a contract　term　or　notice　
satisfies　the
　　irement of reasonableness, the court or arbitrator shall　have　
regard
　　articular (but without prejudice to subsection (2) to whether
(and, if
　　to what extent) the language in which the term or notice is　
expressed
　　language understood by the person　as　against　whom　another　
person
　　s to rely upon the term or notice.
　　Where by reference to a contract term or　notice　a　person　
seeks　to
　　rict liability to a specified sum of money, and the question
arises
　　er this Ordinance　or　the　Misrepresentation　Ordinance　(Cap.　
284))
　　her the term or notice satisfies the　requirement　of　
reasonableness,
　　court or arbitrator shall　have　regard　in　particular　(but　
without
　　udice to subsection (2) or (4)) to--
　　the resources which he could expect to be available　to　him　for　
the
　　ose of meeting the liability should it arise; and
　　how far it was open to him to cover himself by insurance.
　　It is for the person claiming that a contract term or notice
satisfies
　　requirement of reasonableness to prove that it does.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 11 U. K.]
　　Dealing as consumer"
　　A party to a contract "deals as consumer" in relation to another
party
　　
　　he neither makes the contract in the course of a　business　nor　
holds
　　elf out as doing so;
　　the other party does make the contract in the course　of　a　
business;
　　
　　in the case of a contract governed by the law of sale of goods　
or　by
　　ion 12, the goods passing under or in pursuance of the contract
are of
　　pe ordinarily supplied for private use or consumption.
　　Notwithstanding subsection (1), on a sale by auction or by
competitive
　　er the buyer is not in any circumstances to be regarded as dealing　
as
　　umer.
　　It is for the person claiming that a party does not deal　as　
consumer
　　rove that he does not.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 12 U. K.]
　　
　　arieties of exemption clause
　　To　the　extent　that　this　Ordinance　prevents　the　
exclusion　 or
　　riction of any liability it also prevents--
　　making the liability or its　enforcement　subject　to　
restrictive　or
　　ous conditions;
　　excluding or restricting　any　right　or　remedy　in　respect　
of　the
　　ility, or subjecting a person to any prejudice in consequence　of　
his
　　uing any such right or remedy;
　　excluding or restricting rules of evidence or procedure, and (to　
that
　　nt) sections 7, 10, 11 and 12 also prevent　excluding　or　
restricting
　　ility by reference to terms and notices which　 exclude　 or　
restrict
　　relevant obligation or duty.
　　An agreement in writing to submit present　or　future　
differences　to
　　tration is not to be treated under　this　Ordinance　as　
excluding　or
　　ricting any liability.　[cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 13 U. K.]
　　ower to amend Schedules 1 and 2
　　Legislative Council may by resolution amend Schedules 1 and 2.
　PART II CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES
　　
　　dance of liability for negligence, breach of contract, etc.
　　egligence liability
　　A person cannot by reference to any contract term or to a notice
given
　　ersons generally or to particular　persons　exclude　or　
restrict　his
　　ility for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.
　　In the case of other loss or damage, a person　cannot　so　
exclude　or
　　rict his liability for negligence except in so　far　as　the　
term　or
　　ce satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.
　　Where a contract term　or　notice　purports　to　exclude　or　
restrict
　　ility for negligence a person's agreement to or awareness of it
is not
　　tself to be taken as indicating his voluntary acceptance of any
risk.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 2 U. K.]
　　iability arising in contract
　　This section applies as between contracting parties where one of　
them
　　s as consumer or on the other's written standard terms of
business.
　　As against that party, the other cannot by reference to　any　
contract
　　--
　　When himself in breach of contract, exclude or restrict any　
liability
　　is in respect of the breach; or
　　claim to be entitled--
　　to render a contractual performance substantially different from　
that
　　h was reasonably expected of him; or
　　in respect of the whole or any part of his contractual obligation,
to
　　er no performance at all,
　　pt in so far　as　(in　any　of　the　cases　mentioned　above　
in　this
　　ection) the contract term satisfies the requirement of
reasonableness.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 3 U. K.]
　　nreasonable indemnity clauses
　　A person dealing as consumer cannot by reference to any contract　
term
　　ade to indemnify another person (whether a party to　the　
contract　or
　　in respect of liability　that　may　be　incurred　by　the　
other　for
　　igence or breach of contract, except in so far as　the　contract　
term
　　sfies the requirement of reasonableness.
　　This section applies whether the liability in question--
　　is directly that of the person to be indemnified or is incurred
by him
　　riously;
　　is to the person dealing as consumer or to someone else. [cf. 1977　
c.
　　. 4 U. K.]
　　ility arising from sale or supply of goods
　　
　　"Guarantee" of consumer goods
　　In the case of goods of a type ordinarily supplied for private
use　or
　　umption, where loss or damage--
　　arises from the goods proving defective while in consumer use;
and
　　results from the negligence of a person concerned in　the　
manufacture
　　istribution of the goods, liability for the loss or damage　
cannot　be
　　uded or restricted　by　reference　to　any　contract　term　or　
notice
　　ained in or operating by reference to a guarantee of the goods.
　　For these purposes--
　　goods are to be regarded as "in consumer use" when a person　is　
using
　　, or has them in his possession for use,　otherwise　than　
exclusively
　　the purposes of a business; and
　　anything in writing is a guarantee　if　it　contains　or　
purports　to
　　ain some promise or　assurance　(however　worded　or　
presented)　that
　　cts will be made good　by　complete　or　partial　replacement,　
or　by
　　ir, monetary compensation or otherwise.
　　This section does not apply as between the parties to a contract
under
　　n pursuance of which possession or ownership of the goods passed.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 5 U. K.]
　　Seller's liability
　　Liability for breach of the obligations arising from section 14
of the
　　of Goods Ordinance (Cap. 26) (seller's　implied　undertakings　
as　to
　　e, etc.) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference to any
contract
　　.
　　As against a person dealing as consumer, liability for breach　of　
the
　　gations arising from section 15,　16　or　17　of　the　Sale　of　
Goods
　　nance (Cap. 26) (seller's implied undertakings　as　to　
conformity　of
　　s with description or sample, or as to their quality or fitness
for　a
　　icular purpose) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference　to　
any
　　ract term.
　　As against a person dealing otherwise than as consumer, the　
liability
　　ified in subsection (2) can be excluded or restricted by reference　
to
　　ntract term, but only in so far as the term satisfies the　
requirement
　　easonableness.
　　The liabilities referred to in this section are not only the　
business
　　ilities defined by section 2 (2), but include those arising under　
any
　　ract of sale of goods.　[cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 6 U. K.]
　　Miscellaneous contracts under which goods pass
　　Where the　possession　or　ownership　of　goods　passes　
under　or　in
　　uance of a contract　not　governed　by　the　law　of　sale　of　
goods,
　　ection (2) to (4) apply in relation to the effect (if　any)　that　
the
　　t or arbitrator is to give to contract terms excluding or　
restricting
　　ility for breach of obligation arising by implication of law from　
the
　　re of the contract.
　　As against a person dealing as consumer, liability in respect　of　
the
　　's correspondence with description or　sample,　or　their　
quality　or
　　ess for any particular purpose, cannot be excluded　or　
restricted　by
　　rence to any such term.
　　As against a person dealing otherwise than as consumer, that
liability
　　be excluded or restricted by reference to such a term, but only
in　so
　　as the term satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.
　　
　　Liability in respect of--
　　the right to transfer ownership of the goods, or give possession;
or
　　the assurance　of　quiet　possession　to　a　person　taking　
goods　in
　　uance of the contract, cannot be excluded or restricted　by　
reference
　　ny such term except in so far as the term satisfies the requirement
of
　　onableness.　[cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 7 U. K.]
　　r provisions about contracts
　　Effect of breach on "reasonableness" test
　　Where for reliance　upon　it　a　contract　term　has　to　
satisfy　the
　　irement of reasonableness, it may be found　to　do　so　and　be　
given
　　ct accordingly notwithstanding that the contract has　been　
terminated
　　er by breach or by a party electing to treat it as repudiated.
　　Where on a breach the contract is nevertheless　affirmed　by　a　
party
　　tled to treat as repudiated, this　does　not　of　itself　
exclude　the
　　irement of reasonableness in relation to any contract term.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 9 U. K.]
　　Evasion by means of secondary contract
　　rson is not bound by any contract　term　prejudicing　or　taking　
away
　　ts of his which arise under, or in connection with the performance
of,
　　her contract, so far as those rights　extend　to　the　
enforcement　of
　　her's　liability　which　this　Ordinance　prevents　that　
other　 from
　　uding or restricting.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 10 U. K.]
　　Arbitration agreements
　　As against a person dealing as consumer, an agreement to submit
future
　　erences to arbitration cannot be enforced except--
　　with his written consent signified after the differences　in　
question
　　arisen; or
　　where he has himself had recourse to arbitration in pursuance　of　
the
　　ement in respect of any differences.
　　Subsection (1) does not affect--
　　the enforcement of an international arbitration agreement　
within　the
　　ing of section 2 (1) of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 341);
　　laced 76 of 1990 s. 2)
　　the resolution of differences arising under any contract so far
as　it
　　by virtue of Schedule 1, excluded from the operation of section
7,　8,
　　12.
　PART III CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE CONTROL DOES NOT APPLY
　　
　　International supply contracts
　　The limits imposed by this Ordinance on the extent to which　a　
person
　　exclude or restrict liability by reference to a contract term　do　
not
　　y to liability arising under an international supply contract.
　　The terms of an international supply contract are not subject　to　
any
　　irement of reasonableness under section 8 or 9.
　　For the purposes of this section,　an　international　supply　
contract
　　s a contract--
　　that is either a contract of sale of goods or a contract under　
or　in
　　uance of which the possession or ownership of goods passes;
　　that is made by parties whose places of business　(or,　if　they　
have
　　, habitual residences) are in the territories of different　
States　or
　　in and outside Hong Kong; and
　　in the case of which--
　　the goods in question are, at　the　time　of　the　conclusion　
of　the
　　ract, in the　course　of　carriage,　or　will　be　carried,　
from　the
　　itory of one State to the territory of another, or　to　or　from　
Hong
　　from or to a place outside Hong Kong; or
　　the acts constituting the offer and acceptance have been done in　
the
　　itories of different States or in and outside Hong Kong; or
　　) the contract provides for the goods to be delivered to the
territory
　　State other than that within whose territory　the　acts　
constituting
　　offer and acceptance were done; or
　　the acts constituting the offer and acceptance were done in Hong
Kong
　　the contract provides for the goods to be delivered outside Hong
Kong;
　　
　　the acts constituting the offer and acceptance were done outside　
Hong
　　and the contract provides for the goods to be delivered to Hong
Kong.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 26 U. K.]
　　Choice of law clauses
　　Where the proper law of a contract is the law of　Hong　Kong　only　
by
　　ce of the parties (and apart from that choice would be the law
of some
　　r country) sections 7 to 12 do not operate as part of the proper
law.
　　This Ordinance has effect　notwithstanding　any　contract　
term　which
　　ies or purports to apply the law of some other country, where　
(either
　　oth)--
　　the term appears to the court　or　arbitrator　to　have　been　
imposed
　　ly or mainly for the purpose of enabling　the　party　imposing　
it　to
　　e the operation of this Ordinance; or
　　in the making of the contract one of the parties　dealt　as　
consumer,
　　he was then habitually resident in Hong Kong, and the essential　

不分页显示　　　总共2页　　1 [2]

　　下一页